That question is understandable. It is also more complicated than it used to be.

At Nylund’s Collision Center, we are not in the business of telling people what policy they must buy. We are in the business of seeing what happens after a collision, when assumptions meet reality. We see the gap between what people thought would happen and what actually happens. We see the surprise on a driver’s face when a vehicle that still runs ends up being a total loss. We see the financial pressure that follows when repair costs are higher than expected, when another driver does not carry enough insurance, or when a deductible that looked manageable on paper suddenly feels crushing in real life.

That is why this conversation matters.

Dropping full insurance coverage can seem like a smart way to free up cash. In some cases, it may be a reasonable decision. But in today’s repair environment, it can also expose drivers to far more risk than they realize. Vehicles are older. Repairs are more technical. Advanced driver assistance systems are more common. Uninsured and underinsured driver exposure remains a serious concern. Industry data also shows that higher deductibles are changing how people use their policies and whether they file claims at all.

This article is designed to help you think through that decision carefully.

Why more drivers are dropping full insurance coverage

The first thing to understand is that people are not necessarily reducing coverage because they are careless. Many are doing it because they feel cornered.

The total cost of owning and operating a vehicle remains high. AAA’s 2025 “Your Driving Costs” analysis shows that ownership expenses still include substantial costs for fuel, maintenance, repairs, tires, depreciation, and finance charges. Even when one category moderates, the total burden can remain significant for working households.

When money gets tight, drivers start looking for places to trim. Insurance is an obvious target because it is recurring, visible, and feels adjustable. Unlike rent or a car payment, it may appear flexible. Raise the deductible, remove collision, switch to liability only, and the monthly bill may go down.

That is the part people can see.

What many drivers do not see as clearly is that insurance is not just a legal requirement or a budgeting line item. It is a risk transfer tool. When you reduce coverage, you are not merely paying less. You are taking back more of the financial risk yourself.

That may still be a valid choice. But it should be made with clear eyes.

Full coverage is not a magic phrase

Consumers often use the term “full coverage” as if it were a single product. In reality, it is shorthand. Usually, people mean a policy that includes liability plus comprehensive and collision coverage, often alongside other protections such as uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage, medical payments, rental reimbursement, or roadside assistance.

That matters because dropping full insurance coverage does not always mean the same thing from one household to another.

For one driver, it may mean removing collision on an older vehicle. For another, it may mean keeping collision but raising the deductible to $1,000 or more. For someone else, it may mean reducing optional protections that could become very important after a crash involving another underinsured driver.

This is one reason insurance decisions deserve more than a quick conversation based only on the age of the car. The real question is not simply, “Is my vehicle old?” The better question is, “If this vehicle were damaged tomorrow, how much of that loss could I actually absorb without creating a crisis?”

The repair environment has changed

One of the biggest mistakes drivers make is evaluating today’s risk through yesterday’s repair mindset.

Many people still picture collision repair as mostly sheet metal, paint, and a few replacement parts. That is no longer the full picture. Even vehicles that look relatively ordinary may now include cameras, sensors, radar units, blind spot systems, lane departure features, and other driver assistance technologies that depend on proper diagnostics and calibration after a collision or repair. NHTSA makes clear that modern driver assistance technologies are common and important to vehicle safety, which means repairs often involve more than visible cosmetic damage.

That change affects cost.

A moderate front corner hit may involve far more than a bumper cover and some paint work. It can include hidden damage, one time use parts, scanning, measuring, aiming, and calibration procedures that are easy for a consumer to overlook. A car can still be drivable and still be very expensive to repair correctly. That is one of the reasons many drivers are caught off guard after a loss.

At Nylund’s, we advocate for proper OEM-informed repairs because the complexity is real. The repair decision is no longer just about what looks bent or broken. It is about what the manufacturer requires, what the technology demands, and what must be done to restore the vehicle safely and correctly.

That complexity changes the risk of dropping full insurance coverage.

Older vehicles are not always “cheap risk”

A common line of thinking goes like this: “My car is older and paid off, so it probably does not make sense to carry full coverage anymore.”

Sometimes that logic holds up. Sometimes it does not.

The problem is that many people focus only on book value and ignore practical value.

A vehicle that is worth less on paper can still be extremely valuable in everyday life. If it gets you to work, gets your children to school, helps you care for an aging parent, or keeps your household moving, then losing it may create costs far beyond its market value. You may have to rent a vehicle, scramble for replacement transportation, take time off work, or enter a used car market that is still expensive and unpredictable.

In other words, a lower-value vehicle can still carry high real-world importance.

That is why the insurance decision should not be reduced to a simple formula based on age. A better approach is to ask:

What Happens When Dropping Full Insurance Coverage Goes Wrong?

This is the question many people skip, and it is one of the most important.

If your vehicle were seriously damaged tomorrow, could you afford to repair it out of pocket?

If it were declared a total loss, could you replace it quickly?

Could your family function without it for a week? Two weeks? Longer?

Would a sudden transportation problem also become an income problem?

Would it push you into debt?

These are not dramatic questions. They are practical ones. And they often lead to better insurance decisions than “How much can I save each month?”

Higher deductibles can shrink your protection in practice

Even drivers who technically keep full coverage may discover that their protection is thinner than they expected.

J.D. Power reported in 2025 that 26% of auto insurance customers had deductibles of $1,000 or more, and 7% said they had avoided filing a claim because they feared their rates could increase.

That matters because a deductible is not just a number on a declarations page. It shapes behavior.

When deductibles rise, more drivers hesitate to file lower-severity claims. A repair that costs $2,000 may not feel like meaningful “coverage” if the deductible is $1,000 and the household is already financially stretched. A person may technically have collision coverage and still decide not to use it because the immediate out-of-pocket burden is too high or because they worry about future premium increases.

This is one reason broad insurance labels can be misleading. A driver may say, “I still have full coverage,” and yet the practical protection available in a moderate-loss scenario may feel much smaller than expected.

Before changing your policy, it is worth asking not only what coverages you have, but also how usable they really are for your financial situation.

The other driver’s policy matters more than many people think

When people think about insurance, they often focus on protecting themselves from their own mistakes. But one of the biggest risks on the road is not your decision. It is someone else’s.

The Insurance Information Institute cites Insurance Research Council data showing that uninsured motorist rates remain significant, and industry reporting has highlighted that one in three drivers were either uninsured or underinsured in 2023 when those categories are combined.

That is not a small issue.

If another driver causes a crash and does not have enough coverage, the financial burden does not disappear. It shifts. Often, it shifts onto the innocent party and their own policy.

This is where many households are underprepared. They may have uninsured or underinsured coverage for bodily injury but have not taken a close look at how their policy handles property damage, deductibles, or the real cost of restoring or replacing a vehicle in today’s market.

If you are thinking about dropping full insurance coverage, this is one of the most important questions to explore with your agent or broker: what happens if the other driver cannot pay?

That question has become more important, not less.

Why drivable damage can still become a major financial event

One of the most misleading things about collision damage is that a vehicle can look recoverable to a consumer and still turn into a major financial event.

A driver may see a damaged bumper, fender, lamp, and hood and assume the situation is inconvenient but manageable. Yet once disassembly begins, the estimate may expand because modern vehicles hide damage behind the visible impact area. Structural components, mounting points, sensor brackets, reinforcement pieces, and calibration requirements can all add cost and complexity.

This is not about trying to frighten people. It is about replacing guesswork with a more realistic understanding.

When drivers drop collision coverage based on an outdated picture of what repairs cost, they may be assuming that a “repairable” looking loss will stay affordable. That assumption can be badly wrong.

The cheapest policy can become the most expensive outcome

Price matters. No honest conversation about auto insurance should pretend otherwise.

But low monthly premium and low total cost are not the same thing.

A policy can feel affordable for months or years, right up until the day it fails to protect you in the way you expected. That is when the cheapest policy can become the most expensive outcome.

This is especially true in three situations:

1. You rely heavily on the vehicle

If you cannot easily replace your transportation, then a loss hits harder.

2. You do not have cash reserves

If a sudden repair bill or replacement need would force debt, borrowing, or missed obligations, then retaining more risk may not actually be saving you money.

3. You share the road with underinsured drivers

And that is all of us.

Saving money up front is not always wrong. But it should be measured against what the loss would cost if things go badly.

How to evaluate whether dropping full insurance coverage makes sense

There is no one-size-fits-all answer. But there is a better decision process.

Here are the questions we would encourage drivers to ask before dropping full insurance coverage:

Can I comfortably absorb the loss?

Not theoretically. Comfortably. Could you write the check, solve the transportation problem, and move on?

What is the practical value of this car to my life?

Not just its resale value. What does it allow you to do each day?

How large is my deductible now?

And if you raised it, would you still be able to use the policy when you need it?

What protections do I have against uninsured or underinsured drivers?

Ask specific questions. Do not assume.

If my vehicle were totaled, what would replacement actually cost?

Not what you hope it would cost. What would it cost in the current market?

Am I choosing to self-insure, or am I just hoping?

Those are very different things.

This kind of evaluation is not flashy, but it is wise. Insurance decisions are often made quickly and revisited only after a crash. That is backwards. The time to think carefully is before the loss.

A better conversation to have with your agent or broker

If you are reviewing your coverage, go beyond “How can I lower my premium?”

Try asking questions like these instead:

• What would my out-of-pocket exposure be in a moderate collision?
• What happens if the at-fault driver has too little property damage coverage?
• What uninsured or underinsured protections do I have, and what do they actually apply to?
• If I remove collision, what realistic scenarios would leave me paying entirely on my own?
• Is my deductible set at a level I could truly manage this month?
• Are there other policy adjustments that could reduce premium without leaving me exposed in the areas that matter most?

Good questions lead to better decisions.

Why this matters to Nylund’s Collision Center

At Nylund’s Collision Center in Englewood, Colorado, our role begins after the collision. But the problems we see often start before it.

They start when people assume a vehicle repair will be simple because the car still moves.

They start when people believe another driver’s insurance will automatically make them whole.

They start when policy decisions are made based only on monthly premium and not on the real cost of a bad outcome.

Our concern is not only whether a vehicle can be repaired. Our concern is whether people understand the financial and practical risks that surround that repair. A collision is never just about damaged metal. It can also be a transportation problem, an employment problem, a family logistics problem, and, in some cases, a safety problem.

That is why consumer education matters.

We want drivers to ask better questions now, while they still have choices.

The bottom line on dropping full insurance coverage

Dropping full insurance coverage is not automatically irresponsible. For some households, it may be a deliberate and manageable risk decision. But it should be a deliberate decision, not an accidental one driven only by frustration over premiums.

The world around that decision has changed.

Vehicle ownership is expensive. Repair complexity is real. Higher deductibles are affecting how people use their policies. Uninsured and underinsured driver exposure remains a serious issue. Advanced driver assistance technology means even ordinary-looking collision damage can require more technical repair operations than many drivers expect.

So before you reduce coverage, pause.

Think beyond the monthly payment.

Think about the day after the crash.

Think about what your vehicle is really worth to your life.

Think about whether the risk you are taking is one you can genuinely afford to keep.

That is the conversation that matters.

And if this article prompts you to review your policy more carefully, then it has done its job.

The post Dropping Full Insurance Coverage: What Drivers Risk appeared first on Nylunds Collision.

Most people assume their auto policy reflects only the information they personally gave the insurance company. Unfortunately, that assumption can break down when insurers rely on third-party data, address-matching systems, or automated underwriting tools to evaluate risk. When those systems are accurate, few consumers ever notice. However, when they are wrong, the consequences can land directly on the policyholder.

At Nylund’s Collision Center, we talk often about hidden decisions inside the insurance process. Usually that conversation involves repair methods, parts choices, or claim handling. Still, the same larger issue applies here too: consumers can be affected by decisions made behind the scenes, based on data they never see and may never think to question.

Why a wrong driver on insurance policy details can matter

A recent lawsuit highlighted a concern many drivers have probably never considered. According to reporting by Repairer Driven News, a Florida lawsuit alleges that GEICO used third-party database information to identify licensed drivers associated with a policyholder’s address and, in some cases, added those individuals to the policy unless the customer responded within a stated time period. The lawsuit also alleges that some customers then faced extra hurdles when trying to remove people who did not actually belong on the policy. Those are allegations, not proven facts, but the consumer lesson is still important.

An insurer may treat another person as part of the policy if it believes that driver belongs in your household. As a result, your premium could change. Just as importantly, correcting the mistake may not feel simple if the company expects you to prove that its data source was wrong.

That is why this issue matters even beyond one lawsuit. The more insurance systems depend on automation and data matching, the more important it becomes for consumers to review their policy details carefully.

Why address data is not always reliable

This issue becomes easier to understand when you think about how messy address records can be in real life.

People move. Tenants change. Adult children leave home. Former owners still show up in old databases. Mail continues arriving for people who have not lived at an address in years. In other words, the simple idea of “who lives here” is not always simple at all.

That is one reason a policyholder should never assume that the information tied to an address is automatically correct.

When insurers use address-related data to help identify possible household drivers, a bad record can create a bad assumption. Then that assumption can affect a real policy with real financial consequences.

What to review on your declarations page

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners explains that your policy begins with a declarations page and that it identifies important information such as the policy term, coverage limits, and information about the insured.

That makes the declarations page one of the best places to begin if you want to catch a possible problem early.

1. Listed drivers

Read every listed driver carefully.

Make sure each person actually belongs on the policy. If you see a name you do not recognize, or someone who no longer lives in your household and does not regularly drive the vehicle, do not ignore it.

2. Garaging address

Check the garaging address listed on the policy.

This is the address associated with where the vehicle is normally kept, often overnight. If that address is wrong, the insurer may be evaluating your risk using incorrect information. That can matter for rating and premium decisions.

3. Recent policy changes

Look through recent renewal notices, endorsements, and premium changes.

Review any premium increase carefully and request a clear explanation if the reason is not obvious. A premium increase should not feel mysterious.

4. Household assumptions

If your insurer seems to be treating another person as part of your household, ask how that conclusion was reached.

Specifically, ask what information was used, when the change occurred, and whether any notice was sent before the policy was changed.

What to do if you find a wrong driver on insurance policy documents

Should you discover a wrong driver on insurance policy documents, act quickly and keep the process organized.

First, contact your insurer and ask for a clear explanation of the change.

Next, request the details in writing. Ask when the driver was added, what information supported that decision, and what steps are required to correct the record.

Then review all related policy documents, not just the declarations page. Look at endorsements, renewal paperwork, billing notices, and any recent email notices.

Also, keep a paper trail. Save emails, take screenshots, and write down the date, time, and name of every person you speak with.

Finally, be direct and specific. If the person does not live in your household and does not drive your vehicle, say exactly that.

Watch the Airing of GRIEVEances episode

The video below explains why this issue deserves more attention and why bad address data can create very real consumer problems.

After the video, continue reading for the practical checklist you can use on your own policy today.

The bigger consumer issue behind this story

At Nylund’s Collision Center, we believe consumers do better when they understand how insurance decisions are being made.

That principle applies after an accident, when repair procedures and parts choices matter. It also applies before an accident, when the details on your policy need to be accurate. If your insurer is relying on data that does not reflect real life, you deserve the opportunity to spot that problem and challenge it before it affects your premium or complicates a future claim.

This is also why routine policy review matters. Most people do not look at their declarations page unless something goes wrong. Yet a five-minute review can reveal a name, address, or change that does not belong there.

For a related discussion, see our consumer resources page and our guide to understanding insurance estimates after an accident. Those pages can help you better understand the larger pattern of hidden insurance decisions that often affect drivers long before they realize it.

Consumers can also benefit from reviewing the National Association of Insurance Commissioners consumer auto insurance guide and reading the Repairer Driven News report on the Florida lawsuit that helped bring this issue into the open. Those outside resources give additional context on how policy documents work and why address-based assumptions can create problems.

A simple policy check that can save real frustration

A wrong driver on insurance policy records may seem like a small clerical issue. In practice, it can become a bigger problem if it affects premium calculations, household assumptions, or the way your insurer views risk.

That is why one of the smartest habits a driver can build is this: review your declarations page at renewal, after any premium change, and any time something on your policy does not look right.

Check the listed drivers.

Check the garaging address.

Check for unexplained changes.

Then ask questions while there is still time to correct the record.

At Nylund’s Collision Center, we believe consumers should never be passive participants in a system that affects their safety, their finances, and their vehicle. The more clearly you understand your paperwork, the better prepared you are to protect yourself when something does not add up.

The post Wrong Driver on Insurance Policy? Check this First appeared first on Nylunds Collision.

This article walks you through the repair process at many insurance-preferred shops, explains the conflict of interest that can exist in those arrangements, and tells you what questions to ask so that you can protect yourself.

What Is a Direct Repair Program – and Why Does It Matter to You?

Many insurance companies maintain a list of “preferred” or “approved” body shops. These shops have signed a contract with the insurer, agreeing to certain terms in exchange for a steady stream of customers. This arrangement is called a Direct Repair Program, or DRP.

On the surface, that sounds convenient. In practice, though, it creates a conflict of interest. Because the shop has agreed to work within the insurer’s guidelines, the insurance company – not you – effectively becomes the customer. The insurer’s goal is to manage the cost of the repair, which means the shop is often working within a framework that prioritizes what the insurer considers compliant over what the manufacturer recommends.

At Nylund’s, we do not participate in any DRP arrangements. Our repair decisions are guided by one thing: the manufacturer’s procedures for your specific vehicle. That’s an important distinction, and it’s why customers often come to us after having their car repaired elsewhere and finding that something isn’t right.

Person #1: The Estimator – Your Point of Contact, But Not Your Advocate

When you bring your car to a DRP shop, the first person you’ll interact with is the estimator. They catalog the damage, write up the repair plan, and submit it to the insurance company. They’re also your main point of contact throughout the process.

Here’s the problem: that estimator is writing what’s called an “insurance-compliant” estimate. That means the document is built to fit within the box the insurer has defined – which often includes aftermarket parts or used parts, rather than original equipment manufacturer (OEM) parts.

What most estimators won’t tell you: if aftermarket parts are installed on a vehicle that’s still under warranty, it can void portions of that warranty. For example, aftermarket suspension components mean the manufacturer is no longer responsible for that system. That’s information you have a right to know – but in most DRP shops, nobody will bring it up.

Once the estimate is submitted, the insurer may send back a “change request” – essentially a list of items they want removed or swapped out to bring the cost down. That negotiation happens behind the scenes. You’ll never see it. As Rob Grieve of Nylund’s puts it: it’s not good enough until it’s cheap enough. And that’s not a standard any car owner should be satisfied with.

Here is a complete video from our YouTube series, “The Airing of GRIEVEances“.

Decisions Made at Every Stop Through the Shop

The estimator is just the beginning. Once your car enters the repair process, it passes through multiple hands – and at each stop, decisions are made that you may never hear about.

The Body Technician

The body technician is responsible for the physical repairs: replacing panels, welding structural components, and restoring the vehicle’s frame and structure. In a recent post-repair inspection we performed on a nearly new 2024 Toyota RAV4, we found that the radiator support – which was clearly bent and clearly listed on the estimate for replacement – had never been replaced at all. The shop had charged for it. The customer had no idea.

Beyond the missing part, we also found structural components that had been welded in incorrectly and not according to Toyota’s repair procedures. Those aren’t minor issues. Improper welds on structural elements are a safety concern, not a cosmetic one. The body technician made those calls without a single conversation with the vehicle’s owner.

The Painter

After structural work is completed, the car moves to the paint department. Here, too, decisions get made. In the RAV4 case, paint had not been sanded or primed correctly over the weld areas. There were visible runs in the paint on the frame rail. To make it worse, the painter had been paid – per the estimate – to paint the radiator support. The same radiator support that was still bent and had never been replaced.

Nobody called the customer to say, “Is it okay if we leave runs in your paint?” Nobody told them the radiator support wasn’t going to be replaced. The decisions were simply made, the car was reassembled, and it was handed back.

Outside Vendors: The Mechanic and the Calibration Company

Some repairs require work beyond what the body shop handles in-house. In this case, the vehicle needed suspension work. Rather than sending it to the Toyota dealership – where certified technicians with the right tools could handle it properly – the shop sent it to an outside mechanic. The result was suspension hardware that had been installed with the wrong tools, leaving fasteners that hadn’t been properly secured.

The vehicle also required ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance System) calibrations after a front-end hit. Those calibrations need to be performed with manufacturer-specific equipment and software. Whether that standard was met, the customer had no way of knowing.

In total, at least five separate parties made significant decisions about this vehicle — the estimator, the body technician, the painter, whoever chose the outside mechanic, and the mechanic themselves. The customer was consulted about none of it.

How to Protect Yourself When Your Car Needs Collision Repair

Understanding how this process works is the first step. Knowing what to do about it is the second.

Before you ever need a body shop, consider choosing your insurance carrier carefully. Not all insurers treat the repair process the same way. Look for carriers that earn strong marks for claim handling – resources like the insurer report card can help guide that decision before you’re ever in an accident.

When your car does need repairs, remember that you have the right to choose your own shop. Your insurer may recommend their preferred shops, but you are not required to use them. If you do choose a shop on an approved list, ask directly: Do you follow the manufacturer’s repair procedures? Do you use OEM parts? Do you perform all work in-house, or do you send it to outside vendors?

Look for shops that carry manufacturer certifications. A certified Toyota shop, for example, has been trained to repair Toyota vehicles according to Toyota’s specifications. That certification doesn’t automatically guarantee a perfect outcome, but it sets a clear standard that you can hold the shop to.

Finally, ask to see the estimate and have someone walk you through it. You should know what parts are being used, where the work is being performed, and what the repair plan looks like before anything starts.

The Bottom Line: You Get What They Pay For

There’s an old saying that you get what you pay for. In the world of insurance-driven collision repair, the more accurate version is: you get what they pay for. The insurer controls the budget, the DRP shop works within it, and the consumer is often the last to know about the tradeoffs that were made along the way.

The RAV4 we inspected in this episode ultimately became a total loss – not because of the original accident, but because of what happened to it during the repair. A nearly new vehicle, destroyed by a process the owner had no visibility into.

At Nylund’s Collision Center, we do things differently. We follow manufacturer repair procedures. We use OEM parts. We keep customers informed and welcome them to come in and see their car at any stage of the process. And when we can’t do something in-house at the right standard, we send it to the right place – not the cheapest one.

If you have questions about a current or past repair, or you’d like to schedule a post-repair inspection, contact Nylund’s Collision Center. We’re here to make sure you – not the insurer – come first.

The post Who Is Really Making Decisions About Your Auto Body Repair? appeared first on Nylunds Collision.

Stellantis just reminded everyone about their collision repair procedures, especially when it comes to structural fasteners and radar components. Nothing in the update is brand new, but the fact they’re spelling it out again says a lot about what really happens in shops today.

Why This Reminder Matters

At Nylund’s Collision Center, we’ve seen this stuff play out too many times. Vehicle engineers build these cars with exact assumptions in mind. They count on you replacing certain bolts after you take them out. They expect radar sensors to get recalibrated if anything near them gets messed with. And they assume replacement parts match what went through crash testing.

Those assumptions only work if we follow the procedures to the letter.

The Truth About Structural Fasteners

Take structural fasteners. A lot of them are torque-to-yield bolts. They stretch on purpose when you tighten them the first time, creating the right clamping force. Once stretched, the metal changes. Put that same bolt back in and it won’t hold the same way, even if it feels snug.

From the outside, everything looks fine. No dash light comes on. The car drives normally. But in a real crash, that structure might not behave the way it was designed to.

That’s exactly why Stellantis had to clarify this. Reusing one-time-use fasteners isn’t a shortcut. It’s a risk.

Modern Bumpers Are More Than Cosmetic

Bumpers used to be simple. Fix the dents, match the paint, and send it out the door. Now the same bumper might hold radar sensors for blind spot monitoring, rear cross traffic alerts, or parking aids.

Stellantis pointed out clear rules: watch your paint thickness in radar zones, avoid certain repair materials near sensor mounts, and always scan and recalibrate afterward. These sound like small details. They’re not.

Radar systems work in tight tolerances. A little extra paint, a slight shift in angle, or the wrong filler nearby can throw off the signal. The system might still “work.” No warning light pops up. But its detection range or accuracy drifts. In everyday driving you might never notice. In that split-second moment when you need it most, it matters.

Where Insurance and Engineering Meet (and Sometimes Clash)

Insurance adjusters and body shops don’t always see eye to eye here. Engineers want the vehicle back to its exact engineered state. Insurance wants to keep claims reasonable and estimates straightforward.

That’s fair. But an estimate missing a step doesn’t make the step optional. If the manufacturer says it’s required, we do it. Period.

This Isn’t Just About Stellantis

This isn’t just a Stellantis thing. Every major brand counts on precise repairs to keep crash performance and safety systems reliable. Today’s vehicles are complex layers of metal, electronics, and software, all working together in narrow windows. Tiny changes can affect how force travels through the frame or how sensors read the road.

When customers pick up their car, they look at paint shine, panel gaps, and how clean the finish is. Those are easy to see. Replaced fasteners and calibration reports? Not so much. But they matter just as much, if not more.

Questions to Ask Your Collision Repair Shop

If your vehicle’s in the shop after a crash, ask a few straight questions:

• Are we following the Stellantis collision repair procedures for my exact model?
• Were any single-use parts removed? Did they get replaced with new ones?
• Are we using genuine factory parts where the manufacturer calls for them?
• Did you run all the required scans and recalibrations, and do you have the documentation?

Good shops won’t hesitate to answer. Straight talk builds trust.

Our Commitment at Nylund’s Collision Center

Insurance is supposed to put you back to pre-loss condition. That includes structural strength and full safety system function, not just making it look nice on the outside.

Here at Nylund’s Collision Center in Englewood, Colorado, we treat manufacturer procedures as the rule book. Single-use parts get replaced. Recalibrations happen and get documented. Genuine components go in when specified. We don’t cut corners for convenience. We do it to match what the engineers tested and validated.

This latest Stellantis reminder reinforces what we’ve always believed: real repairs respect the original design.

Want to dive deeper? Check out this week’s episode of The Airing of GRIEVEances. We break down the announcement and talk about how it hits the shop floor.

Nylund’s Collision Center 4495 S Santa Fe Dr Englewood, CO 80110

Body shop, collision repair, car accident repair Lexus Authorized, Toyota Certified, Lucid Certified

When a vehicle is built with precision, the repair should match that same care.

The post Stellantis Collision Repair Procedures appeared first on Nylunds Collision.

What the 2026 Insurer Report Card Measures

Crash Network publishes the 2026 Insurer Report Card annually. The report captures the experience of shop owners, managers, and technicians who work with insurers every day. It does not measure advertising presence or brand familiarity. Instead, it evaluates how insurers handle claims when vehicles need proper repairs.

The survey centers on one question: how well do an insurer’s claim handling policies, attitude, and payment practices ensure quality repairs and customer service for motorists? Shops answer based on direct experience. They do not rely on marketing claims or slogans.

The median score this year was 680. Insurers that scored above that number performed at or above average. Insurers that scored below it created more difficulty during the repair process. That difference becomes critical when your vehicle requires manufacturer procedures and safety calibrations.

Why the Largest Insurers Rank Low on the 2026 Insurer Report Card

Roughly 200 auto insurers operate nationwide. However, the ten largest companies insure about three-quarters of all drivers. Despite their size and visibility, those top ten insurers once again failed to reach the midpoint of the survey rankings.

The highest-ranked company among the largest insurers still scored below the overall median. The lowest performer ranked far lower. Market dominance clearly does not guarantee strong claim support. When a collision happens, performance matters more than brand recognition.

The Honor Roll: Insurers Scoring B or Better

Some insurers continue to earn strong grades. The 2026 Insurer Report Card highlights companies that received a B or better for their claim practices. These insurers demonstrate stronger support for proper repairs and fair payment procedures.

Companies such as North Carolina Farm Bureau, Alfa Mutual, Chubb, Erie Insurance, Acuity Insurance, Michigan Farm Bureau, PURE Insurance, Southern Farm Bureau, AIG Private Client, and Amica earned high marks this year. Many operate regionally, and some serve only select states. However, their performance shows that insurers can choose to support manufacturer-required repair procedures.

In many cases, these companies approve necessary operations quickly and move vehicles through the repair process with fewer obstacles. That support reduces stress for vehicle owners and repair facilities alike.

Why the 2026 Insurer Report Card Matters to Drivers

Most drivers experience a collision only once every eight to twelve years. Because of that, many people do not evaluate their insurer’s claim performance until they need it. By then, they are already managing the stress of an accident.

After a collision, drivers often face vehicle damage, transportation issues, and scheduling disruptions. If an insurer resists paying for required procedures or delays approvals, the burden shifts to the vehicle owner. Some drivers must decide whether to pay out of pocket for proper repairs or accept incomplete work.

Higher-rated insurers typically approve appropriate repair procedures more efficiently. They create fewer disputes and reduce unnecessary delays. That difference can significantly affect your overall repair experience.

Advertising Does Not Equal Claim Performance

Many of the lowest-ranked insurers are household names. They invest heavily in advertising and brand recognition. Marketing shapes perception, but it does not determine how an insurer handles a claim.

The 2026 Insurer Report Card reflects daily experiences from professionals who advocate for proper repairs. When an insurer consistently receives low grades, that pattern deserves attention. Insurance exists to protect you when something goes wrong. How a company performs during a claim reveals its true priorities.

Our Perspective at Nylund’s Collision Center

At Nylund’s Collision Center in Englewood, Colorado, we work with insurance companies every day. Our responsibility is to repair vehicles according to manufacturer specifications and restore them safely. We are Lexus Authorized, Toyota Certified, and Lucid Certified. Those certifications require strict adherence to OEM repair procedures.

When insurers support those procedures, repairs move forward efficiently. When insurers resist them, the process becomes more complicated and stressful for the consumer. The 2026 Insurer Report Card reinforces what many drivers discover after filing a claim: not all insurance companies approach repairs the same way.

Choosing the right insurer before an accident can make a measurable difference. Reviewing real-world claim performance helps drivers make informed decisions long before they need to file a claim.

Resources

• Crash Network – 2026 Insurer Report Card
  https://www.crashnetwork.com

• National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) – Consumer Resources
  https://content.naic.org/consumer

• Insurance Information Institute – Auto Insurance Overview
  https://www.iii.org/article/auto-insurance-basics

The post 2026 Insurer Report Card: What It Means for Your Collision Repair appeared first on Nylunds Collision.

Recently introduced legislation in Georgia highlights concerns that extend far beyond one state. In fact, drivers across the country report pressure to use certain repair facilities, disputes over manufacturer procedures, and frustrating delays in supplemental approvals.

These patterns are not isolated. Instead, they reflect broader claim handling practices that affect policyholders nationwide.

What Is Insurance Steering?

Insurance steering occurs when an insurer attempts to influence your choice of repair facility.

For example, a representative may suggest a preferred shop as the “best” option, imply your claim may not be paid in full elsewhere, or create friction when you select another facility. While insurers may offer recommendations, they cannot require you to use a specific shop.

According to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, consumers have the right to choose their repair facility when filing a claim. When a recommendation turns into pressure, steering has begun.

Why OEM Repair Rights Matter

OEM repair rights protect your ability to have your vehicle repaired according to manufacturer procedures.

Modern vehicles function as integrated systems. As a result, proper repairs often require structural measurement, advanced driver assistance system calibration, pre- and post-repair scanning, specific bonding materials, and approved replacement parts.

Automakers design vehicles to precise engineering standards. Therefore, skipping documented procedures can compromise structural performance and safety system functionality. Cost control should never override manufacturer repair documentation.

Federal safety oversight reinforces the importance of manufacturer compliance. You can review vehicle safety standards through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Even a small deviation from documented procedures can affect how a vehicle performs in a future collision.

How Claim Delays Affect Proper Repairs

During repairs, technicians frequently uncover hidden damage. When that occurs, the repair facility submits a supplemental estimate to the insurer for review.

At that stage, delays often create serious consequences. Extended approval timelines can increase rental expenses, lengthen downtime, disrupt family schedules, and create unnecessary stress.

Clear communication reduces uncertainty. Likewise, written explanations for denied or reduced line items protect consumers from confusion and help maintain transparency. Without defined timelines, policyholders remain in limbo.

Insurance Steering and OEM Repair Rights in Colorado and Beyond

Although the recent legislation applies to Georgia, similar issues affect drivers in Colorado and throughout the country. In addition, state legislatures nationwide continue to evaluate insurance regulatory practices and consumer protections. Broader policy trends can be reviewed through the National Conference of State Legislatures.

At Nylund’s Collision Center in Englewood, we regularly speak with guests who describe pressure to use certain shops, challenges obtaining approval for OEM procedures, unexplained supplemental delays, and vague coverage interpretations.

These experiences share a common theme: lack of transparency. Consumers deserve clear communication about how their vehicles will be repaired and why coverage decisions are made.

Your Rights as a Policyholder

Understanding insurance steering and OEM repair rights strengthens your position before a claim begins.

As a policyholder, you have the right to select the repair facility that works on your vehicle. Additionally, you may request repairs that follow manufacturer procedures and ask for written explanations if an insurer denies specific operations. You may also inquire whether the insurer has a financial interest in a recommended shop.

Your insurance policy represents a contract designed to protect you. It does not exist to serve an internal cost-control strategy.

Practical Steps to Protect Your Repair Rights

If you need to file a claim, proactive preparation can make a significant difference.

First, select your repair facility before discussing insurer recommendations. By doing so, you establish control over where your vehicle will be evaluated and repaired from the outset.

Next, ask whether the repair plan follows documented OEM procedures. When possible, request written confirmation so you have clear documentation of the intended scope of work.

If the insurer denies or reduces any line items, request a written explanation that references policy language. In addition, track the dates when supplemental estimates are submitted and when responses are received. Keeping a simple record not only prevents unnecessary delays but also strengthens your position if disputes arise.

Finally, maintain copies of all communication related to your claim. Organized documentation increases clarity, reduces confusion, and protects your interests throughout the repair process.

Preparation reduces conflict. More importantly, it promotes transparency.

Watch the Full Discussion

In this episode of The Airing of GRIEVEances, we break down the proposed legislation, explain why it matters beyond Georgia, and discuss how insurance steering and OEM repair rights affect drivers nationwide.

The Bottom Line

You should never feel pressured to choose a repair facility. You should never remain uncertain about manufacturer procedures. Likewise, you should not wait indefinitely for supplemental approvals.

Insurance steering and OEM repair rights protect your vehicle, your investment, and your family’s safety.

When policyholders understand their rights, insurers must respond with greater transparency. Ultimately, proper repairs require documentation, accountability, and adherence to manufacturer standards.

If you have questions about your repair options or want clarification about OEM procedures, contact Nylund’s Collision Center in Englewood, Colorado. Our team focuses on clear communication and manufacturer-compliant repairs performed according to documented standards.

The post Insurance Steering and OEM Repair Rights | What Drivers Must Know appeared first on Nylunds Collision.

In this article, we explain what insurance guaranteed repairs actually mean, where responsibility often shifts, and why some unsafe repairs only surface during a post-repair inspection.

What “Insurance Guaranteed Repairs” Really Means

When an insurer recommends a preferred repair shop, the insurer typically claims the repairs are guaranteed for as long as the customer owns the vehicle. That guarantee does not usually mean the insurer directly stands behind the repair work.

In most cases:

• The repair shop issues the written repair guarantee

• The insurer defers responsibility back to that shop

• The consumer must return to the same shop if something goes wrong

This structure creates confusion when repairs fail. Drivers expect the insurer to step in. Instead, they often discover that the guarantee depends on whether the original shop agrees that a problem exists.

Why Failed Repairs Are So Hard to Identify

Most drivers judge repair quality by what they can see. Panel gaps, paint texture, or trim alignment may raise concerns, but structural problems remain hidden behind panels and inside frame rails.

In the video case study, a late-model Lexus arrived for a post-repair inspection. Exterior misalignment prompted a deeper investigation. That inspection revealed:

• Bent structural components

• Improperly welded frame sections

• Missing or incomplete welds inside the frame rail

These conditions directly affect how a vehicle manages collision energy in a future crash.

When Insurance Guaranteed Repairs Fail

When unsafe repairs surface, consumers often expect insurers to immediately correct the issue. Today, insurers frequently respond by directing the customer back to the original repair shop.

That process creates several problems:

• The original shop may dispute the findings

• Liability concerns delay corrective action

• The vehicle may become a total loss due to repair costs

• The consumer absorbs weeks or months of stress

In recent cases, insurers ultimately declared vehicles total losses not because of the original accident, but because improper repairs made safe correction impractical.

Why Post-Repair Inspections Matter

A post-repair inspection provides an independent evaluation of repair quality and safety. Qualified inspections often include:

• Measurement of structural alignment

• Removal of exterior components for visual access

• Internal inspection using borescopes

• Verification of weld quality and attachment points

These inspections help identify problems before another collision exposes them in the worst possible way.

Who Is Actually Responsible for the Repair?

Responsibility depends on who controls the repair process.

At Nylund’s Collision Center, the responsibility stays clear. The shop answers directly to the vehicle owner, not to an insurer’s repair program. That structure removes divided accountability and eliminates blame shifting when issues arise.

Shops that operate independently can prioritize:

• Manufacturer repair procedures

• Proper structural restoration

• Long-term vehicle safety

• Immediate correction if an issue appears

What Drivers Should Ask Before Trusting a Repair Guarantee

Before accepting insurance guaranteed repairs, drivers should request written answers to the following:

• Who issues the repair guarantee

• Who pays if the repair fails

• Who decides whether the repair meets standards

• What happens if the shop disagrees with the findings

Clear answers protect consumers long before problems develop.

The Bottom Line for Colorado Drivers

Insurance guaranteed repairs may sound comprehensive, but the protection often depends on fine print and divided responsibility. Safe repairs require transparency, accountability, and adherence to manufacturer procedures.

If your vehicle has already been repaired and you have concerns, a professional post-repair inspection can provide clarity and peace of mind.

Related Topics You May Find Helpful

• OEM repair standards and why they matter

• Post-repair inspections after an accident

• Structural damage vs cosmetic damage

The post Insurance Guaranteed Repairs appeared first on Nylunds Collision.

After a collision, most drivers expect a straightforward process. A body shop repairs the vehicle, and the owner gets it back in safe condition.

The reality often looks different.

Pricing systems, insurance guidelines, and third-party platforms influence many repair decisions before a vehicle owner ever sees an estimate. These unseen factors shape which procedures move forward, which ones face resistance, and which ones never appear on the repair plan.

That reality makes one question especially important for consumers to understand: who decides how your car is repaired?

Modern Vehicle Repairs Go Beyond Cosmetic Work

Modern vehicles depend on technology. Cameras, sensors, computers, and software work together to keep drivers safe.

After an accident, vehicle manufacturers commonly require:

• Diagnostic scans before and after repairs

• Calibration of safety cameras and sensors

• Verification of advanced driver-assistance systems

• Documentation confirming completion of these steps

Manufacturers do not list these procedures as optional. They require them to restore the vehicle to a safe operating condition.

When technicians skip or rush these steps, warning lights often stay off. The vehicle may drive normally even when a system no longer performs as designed.

How Pricing Pressure Shapes Repair Decisions

In the video linked below, we discuss how pricing expectations influence the repair process.

When estimating systems introduce standardized prices that do not reflect manufacturer requirements, those prices often turn into informal limits. Over time, they influence how shops write estimates and how insurers review them.

For vehicle owners, this pressure can lead to:

• Required procedures facing delays or pushback

• Repairs written to meet cost targets instead of safety needs

• Confusion when a shop explains that an insurer declined payment

In many cases, shops do not resist these procedures. The system surrounding them creates the resistance.

Video: Who Really Decides How Your Car Is Repaired?

At this point, it helps to hear the issue explained directly.

In this episode of Airing of GRIEVEances, we explain how industry pricing decisions can affect real repair outcomes and what consumers should understand before approving a repair.

What “The Insurance Company Won’t Pay for That” Really Means

When a vehicle owner hears that phrase, it often sounds final.

Insurance policies typically promise to restore a vehicle to its pre-loss condition. They do not replace or override manufacturer repair requirements.

When a repair step faces resistance, consumers can ask direct follow-up questions, such as:

• Is this procedure required by the vehicle manufacturer?

• What risk does skipping this step create?

• Will the repair documentation show whether this step was completed?

These questions move the conversation away from cost alone and back toward safety and accountability.

Why Transparency Protects Consumers

Most repair decisions happen long before a customer stands at the front counter. Estimating platforms, insurer guidelines, and third-party systems shape those decisions out of view.

That lack of visibility creates risk for consumers who do not know what questions to ask.

Education changes that balance. When drivers understand how the process works, they can participate in repair decisions instead of accepting them without explanation.

How Nylund’s Collision Center Handles Repairs

At Nylund’s Collision Center, we base repair decisions on manufacturer procedures and documented safety requirements.

Our team focuses on:

• Following OEM repair guidelines

• Performing required diagnostic scans and calibrations

• Documenting completed procedures

• Explaining repair decisions clearly to vehicle owners

When a procedure protects the safety of the vehicle and its occupants, we perform it and document it.

Questions Every Car Owner Should Ask After a Collision

After an accident, car owners can ask:

• Did you scan my vehicle before and after repairs?

• Did the repair require any calibrations, and did you complete them?

• Did the repair follow manufacturer procedures?

• Did cost influence whether any step was left out?

These questions help ensure that repair decisions focus on safety rather than convenience or price.

Additional Consumer Resources

For drivers who want to better understand vehicle safety requirements and their rights after a collision, the following resources provide reliable, non-commercial information:

• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
  https://www.nhtsa.gov/vehicle-safety
  The federal authority on vehicle safety systems, recalls, and post-collision risks. This resource helps consumers understand why proper repairs and functioning safety systems matter.

• OEM1Stop (Manufacturer Repair Information Portal)
  https://www.oem1stop.com
  A centralized access point used by vehicle manufacturers to provide official repair procedures, calibration requirements, and technical documentation.

• I-CAR (Inter-Industry Conference on Auto Collision Repair)
  https://www.i-car.com
  An industry-recognized organization focused on training, repair standards, and proper collision repair techniques, including diagnostics and ADAS calibration.

These resources can help consumers make informed decisions and ask better questions about how their vehicles are repaired after an accident.

The post Who Really Decides How Your Car Is Repaired? appeared first on Nylunds Collision.

Most drivers assume that if their vehicle has been repaired after a collision, it’s been restored to a safe, roadworthy condition. Unfortunately, a recent federal warning makes it clear that this assumption can be dangerous.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued an urgent alert regarding counterfeit airbag inflators that are likely being illegally imported into the United States and installed in vehicles after collisions. These inflators are not just defective — they’ve been linked to multiple fatalities and severe injuries.

In the video above, Nylund’s Collision Center breaks down what this warning means for everyday drivers, especially those who own or are shopping for used vehicles.

This article expands on that discussion and explains why this issue keeps resurfacing — and what consumers can do to protect themselves.

What Is an Airbag Inflator — and Why Does It Matter?

An airbag inflator is the component responsible for rapidly filling the airbag during a crash. It is a critical life-saving device that must meet strict federal safety standards.

When properly engineered and manufactured:

• The inflator deploys the airbag smoothly

• The force is controlled

• The occupant is protected

When counterfeit or substandard inflators are used:

• Deployment can be violent and unpredictable

• The inflator can rupture

• Metal fragments can be propelled into the cabin

In several documented cases, crashes that were otherwise survivable became fatal because the airbag itself failed catastrophically.

NHTSA’s Warning: What Drivers Need to Know

According to NHTSA, certain replacement airbag inflators — primarily manufactured overseas and not approved for use in the U.S. — are appearing in vehicles after collision repairs.

Key concerns raised by federal investigators include:

• Inflators likely imported illegally

• Parts installed outside OEM repair channels

• Use in vehicles that previously deployed airbags

• Higher prevalence in salvage or rebuilt vehicles

While some vehicle models have been specifically identified in investigations, this is not limited to any single brand or manufacturer.

The broader issue is post-collision repairs performed without proper parts verification.

How Long Have Counterfeit Airbags Been a Problem?

This issue is not new.

Federal regulators have warned about counterfeit or substandard airbag components for more than a decade. As early as 2012, testing revealed that some non-OEM airbags:

• Failed to deploy

• Deployed inconsistently

• Deployed with excessive force

What has changed in recent years is not the existence of the problem — but the ability to conclusively link injuries and deaths to specific counterfeit inflators.

As investigations have become more detailed, patterns have emerged across multiple crashes, states, and repair scenarios. That growing body of evidence is what prompted NHTSA’s most recent urgent warning.

Why Repaired Vehicles Are Most at Risk

Vehicles that have been involved in serious collisions are more vulnerable because:

• Airbags must be replaced after deployment

• Repairs often happen out of sight of the vehicle owner

• Cost pressures can influence part selection

• Salvage or rebuilt vehicles may change hands multiple times

Without strict adherence to OEM repair procedures, unsafe parts can be introduced without the owner ever knowing.

This is why who repairs your vehicle — and how they repair it — matters.

What Used-Car Buyers and Owners Should Do Now

If you own or are considering buying a used vehicle, especially one with a prior accident history, here are important steps you can take:

1. Review the vehicle history

Look for records of:

• Prior collisions

• Airbag deployment

• Salvage or rebuilt title branding

2. Ask direct questions about repairs

If airbags were replaced, ask:

• Were OEM airbag components used?

• Were inflators sourced directly from the manufacturer?

• Is documentation available?

3. Have the airbag system inspected

A qualified repair facility or dealership can verify whether proper components were installed.

4. Be cautious with “too good to be true” pricing

Significantly cheaper repairs often come with hidden compromises — especially when it comes to safety systems.

Why OEM-Correct Repairs Matter

At Nylund’s Collision Center, repairs are performed according to manufacturer procedures, using OEM-approved parts whenever required for safety.

This approach isn’t about speed or shortcuts — it’s about:

• Vehicle integrity

• Occupant safety

• Long-term reliability

When it comes to airbags and other restraint systems, there is no acceptable margin for error.

Final Thoughts: Safety Should Never Be Assumed

An airbag is designed to save your life. If it’s counterfeit, improperly sourced, or illegally installed, it can do the opposite.

NHTSA’s warning is a reminder that safety doesn’t end when the crash is over. It extends through the repair process — and that process must be transparent, verifiable, and manufacturer-correct.

If you have questions about prior repairs, airbag replacements, or collision damage, Nylund’s Collision Center is here to help you make informed decisions — because when it comes to safety, assumptions can be dangerous.

The post Counterfeit Airbag Inflators appeared first on Nylunds Collision.

Auto insurance costs are rising across the country, yet many drivers feel less protected than ever. Instead of delivering peace of mind, insurance now creates hesitation, frustration, and financial stress, especially when drivers need to use the coverage they pay for every month.

Recent investigative reporting highlights a growing disconnect between what drivers expect from auto insurance and what they experience in reality. As premiums and deductibles climb, more consumers avoid filing claims, delay repairs, or pay out of pocket to prevent future rate increases. That behavior points to a deeper system problem.

Why Auto Insurance Costs Keep Increasing

Vehicles have changed dramatically over the last decade. Nearly every modern car now includes advanced driver assistance systems, cameras, sensors, and complex electronics. Proper repairs require specialized equipment, manufacturer-approved procedures, and post-repair calibrations.

These changes increase repair costs, but insurance coverage has not kept pace.

Instead, insurers respond by raising premiums, increasing deductibles, and tightening claim oversight. While these measures protect insurance profitability, they also shift more financial responsibility onto drivers.

As auto insurance costs rise, drivers absorb more risk that insurance once carried.

The Rise of Claim Avoidance

Rising auto insurance costs have fueled a sharp increase in claim avoidance. Many drivers hesitate before contacting their insurer, even after legitimate accidents.

They ask:

• Will my rates increase?

• Is filing a claim worth it?

• Can I afford the deductible?

When insurance creates doubt instead of reassurance, it fails its core purpose.

Claim avoidance may feel like a financial decision, but it often leads to delayed or incomplete repairs, especially on modern vehicles where damage extends beyond what drivers can see.

Safety Risks Hidden Behind Cost Decisions

Modern vehicles operate as integrated safety systems. A damaged sensor, an improperly repaired structure, or a skipped calibration can compromise emergency braking, lane-keeping assistance, and airbag deployment.

When drivers avoid insurance claims to control auto insurance costs, safety becomes negotiable. That outcome benefits no one.

At Nylund’s Collision Center, we regularly inspect vehicles repaired partially or incorrectly because coverage limits forced cost-based decisions instead of safety-based ones.

Who Feels the Impact Most

Rising auto insurance costs affect nearly every driver, but they hit hardest during periods of financial instability. Job loss, medical expenses, or temporary coverage lapses often result in dramatically higher premiums when drivers re-enter the insurance system.

Drivers do not avoid insurance because they dismiss safety. They avoid it because the system penalizes vulnerability instead of supporting recovery.

What This Means for Collision Repair

Correct collision repair follows manufacturer repair procedures, uses appropriate parts, and restores vehicle safety systems to proper function. These standards exist to protect occupants, not to inflate repair bills.

When insurance coverage fails to align with real-world repair requirements, drivers face impossible choices. Repair quality suffers, safety declines, and trust erodes.

Repair decisions should never feel like financial gambles, yet rising auto insurance costs increasingly force that calculation.

Education and Transparency Matter

Drivers deserve clear, accurate information about:

• What their policy covers

• How deductibles affect repair decisions

• Why correct repairs protect long-term safety

Education helps restore trust. Transparency empowers drivers to make informed decisions, even when insurance pressure complicates the process.

Watch the Full Discussion

We explore these issues in greater depth in the video embedded below, including why so many drivers hesitate to use their insurance and how rising auto insurance costs affect safety and repair outcomes.

Insurance should reduce uncertainty, not create it. Until coverage better reflects modern vehicles and repair realities, these conversations remain essential for every driver.

Suggested Resources:

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
https://www.nhtsa.gov/road-safety/vehicle-safety
(Federal authority on vehicle safety systems, crash avoidance technology, and ADAS-related topics.)

Insurance Information Institute (III)
https://www.iii.org/fact-statistic/facts-statistics-auto-insurance
(Consumer-focused explanations of auto insurance premiums, deductibles, and cost drivers.)

MarketWatch – Auto Insurance Cost Coverage
https://www.marketwatch.com/personal-finance/insurance
(Reputable financial journalism covering rising auto insurance costs and consumer impact.)

The post Auto Insurance Costs Are Rising appeared first on Nylunds Collision.